In Hana Kitasei and Tim Reckart’s animated video, *Summer Vacation*, Angela says that stereographic projection preserves angles. Here’s a proof.

First, let’s recall what stereographic projection is. Angela uses stereographic projection to make a map of the earth. A light source at the North Pole projects the continents onto a flat screen tangent to the earth’s South pole. In other words, Angela is making a drawing of the earth’s surface as seen from the North Pole (you have to imagine that you can see through the earth) on a *huge* canvas.

The process distorts distances and areas, particularly as you near the North Pole. However, Angela claimed that angles *are* preserved and we’re going to prove this now.

First, let’s observe that if we move the screen back and forth along the North-South axis (keeping it oriented perpendicular to that axis), the different maps obtained will all be similar to each other. Bringing the screen closer to the North Pole makes the whole map smaller and moving the screen further away enlarges everything. Since scaling preserves angles, if we can show that stereographic projection to any screen perpendicular to the North-South axis preserves angles, then we will have shown that Angela’s stereographic projection preserves angles. (Aside: Stereographic projection is usually done onto a screen that contains the equator.)

Next, let’s exploit the symmetry of the sphere. The whole setup is symmetric with respect to rotations around the North-South axis. So we only need to concern ourselves with the projection near one specific line of longitude. Pick a longitudinal line and select a point on it. [Added June 26, 2018: Assume is in the Southern hemisphere. For the case where is in the Northern hemisphere, see the comment below by Peter Ells.] Imagine two great circles passing through They form some angle We have to show that the angle between the projections of these two great circles is also equal to

Notice that if we’re able to show the result when one of the great circles is the line of longitude containing then we’d be done because all other angles can be obtained as the difference between two angles which have this longitudinal line as a side. So let’s assume that one of the sides of our angle is the longitudinal line containing

The figure below shows the essentials from a vantage point hovering roughly over the North pole and looking down the North-South axis. We’ve indicated the angle by lines tangent to (and in the same plane of) the great circles that define it. For reasons that will soon become clear, these two lines are used to form a (blue) right triangle with a third line that passes directly below the South Pole and is perpendicular to the plane of our longitudinal line. Let and be the vertices of this right triangle where is the vertex at the right angle.

Let’s stereographically project angle onto a screen perpendicular to the North-South axis at the point :

(By the way, sometimes it’s more confusing to try to follow someone else’s geometric proof than it is to construct the proof for yourself. You might want to ignore the next 3 paragraphs and see if you can finish the proof on your own.)

We have to show that . Right triangles and share the common side so if we can show that then we’d be done. We’re going to show that by showing that triangle is isosceles.

Observe that angle is right because is tangent to the longitudinal line. Thus, angles and are complementary. Angle is right because the screen was set up to be perpendicular to the North-South axis. Therefore, angles and are complementary too.

Because and are both radii of the earth, triangle is isosceles and angles and are congruent. Since angles and are complementary to congruent angles, they must be congruent to each other. Therefore, triangle is isosceles, and we’re done!

I know this was posted a long time ago, but I’m doing a presentation on stereographic projection and this was EXACTLY what I needed. Thank you so much, you have saved this math girl a lot of time!

Thanks,

This is a very intuitive answer.

I found it easier to draw a third diagram featuring just triangle NRP’, points C & P, and the lines joining them.

Regards,

Peter

Hello (again),

I’ve just noticed that when P is north of the equator the proof has to be amended slightly. In this situation both point R and the corresponding plane/screen R must be *above* the north pole N. We can still have stereographic projection from the north pole – in which P, N, P’ all lie on a straight line – but now point N lies *between* points P and P’.

A little thought will show that the map/screen at distance d directly above the north pole is identical in scale to the map at the same distance d below. The only difference is that the “above N” map is rotated by 180 degrees about the NS axis with respect to its twin below.

With an appropriately amended diagram it is possible to show that RP = RP’, as required. The points P exactly on the equator are still to be discussed. I think that, now that conformality has been proven for all points above and below the equator, the result for these equatorial points follows by continuity.

Thanks once again for your very useful webpage,

Peter.

Excellent point! Thank you for pointing this out and providing details for the fix.